top of page

Michael Chèze

Towards a better future

Mapping the forces of planetary change

robotic_assembly_2.jpg
DRIVER 2 - INDUSTRIAL MACHINE LOGIC
 

Industrialisation did far more than introduce new technologies. It introduced a way of seeing the world — one that treats reality as something to be broken down, standardised, optimised, and controlled. Over time, this machine-centred logic migrated far beyond factories, shaping how we organise economies, institutions, time, labour, and even ourselves.

In this worldview, success is measured through efficiency, scale, speed, and output. Variability becomes a problem to be eliminated; context becomes friction; limits become obstacles to overcome. What cannot be measured, standardised, or optimised is often sidelined or ignored.

From tools to worldview

Machines are extraordinarily powerful tools. The problem arises when the logic that makes machines effective is applied indiscriminately to living systems.

Living systems:

  • Are relational rather than linear

  • Depend on diversity, redundancy, and care

  • Thrive within limits

  • Change qualitatively, not just quantitatively
     

Machine logic, by contrast:
 

  • Privileges uniformity over diversity

  • Values throughput over resilience

  • Treats limits as inefficiencies

  • Assumes control is both possible and desirable
     

When this logic becomes dominant, systems designed to support life begin to behave as though life itself were a mechanical process.

How machine logic reshapes society

As industrial logic spreads, it subtly reorganises priorities across society.

Work becomes:

  • Fragmented into tasks

  • Evaluated through metrics

  • Pressured toward constant productivity
     

Institutions become:

  • Oriented toward performance indicators

  • Risk-averse in form but reckless in impact

  • Focused on optimisation rather than purpose
     

Time becomes:

  • Accelerated

  • Commodified

  • Stripped of rhythm, rest, and seasonality
     

Over time, this produces societies that are highly productive but increasingly brittle — efficient at doing things quickly, but poor at asking whether those things are worth doing at all.

Efficiency without wisdom

One of the most dangerous aspects of industrial machine logic is that it often appears rational.

Optimisation feels responsible.
Standardisation feels fair.
Scaling feels necessary.

Yet without philosophical and ecological grounding, optimisation can:

  • Erode meaning in work and life

  • Displace care with compliance

  • Reduce complex realities to crude proxies

  • Amplify harm while appearing neutral
     

In such systems, damage is rarely intentional — it is simply rendered invisible by abstraction.

The loss of qualitative judgement

Machine logic favours what can be quantified. As a result, qualitative judgement — the ability to discern what is appropriate, sufficient, or wise in a given context — steadily erodes.

This affects:

  • Education (learning reduced to performance)

  • Healthcare (care reduced to throughput)

  • Environmental management (nature reduced to resource units)

  • Governance (policy reduced to targets and dashboards)

When judgement is replaced by procedure, responsibility becomes diffuse and moral agency weakens.

How this driver reinforces the others

Industrial machine logic:

  • Is financed and accelerated by the monetary system

  • Is normalised and defended through consumption narratives

  • Is institutionalised through governance structures obsessed with growth and competitiveness
     

Together, these dynamics reward systems that move fast and scale easily — even when they degrade the very foundations they depend on.

Why this driver matters for renewal

Addressing industrial machine logic does not mean rejecting technology or efficiency. It means restoring discernment — recognising where mechanistic approaches belong, and where they do not.

Living systems require:

  • Care rather than control

  • Sufficiency rather than maximisation

  • Context rather than uniformity

  • Responsibility rather than optimisation
     

Without this shift, even well-intentioned transitions risk reproducing the same patterns of extraction and alienation under new labels.

What this driver reveals

Industrial machine logic helps explain why:

  • Burnout coexists with productivity

  • Technological solutions often deepen social problems

  • Environmental “management” can accelerate degradation

  • People feel increasingly disconnected despite constant activity
     

These are not personal failures.
They are systemic consequences of applying the wrong logic to living worlds.
​​

  • LinkedIn

MICHAEL CHÈZE

Cape Town, South Africa

CONTACT

+27 (73) 146 0136

mcheze@icloud.com

Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved

bottom of page